Regarding one tiny footnote inThe People v. O.J.
Twenty-three seconds is one third of one percent of the total shows total running time.
(you’ve got the option to read the full recaphere.)
Credit: FX
Oh my God, exclaims the hostess.
It means nothing without a virtuous heart.
This is classic satire.
FX
Defined as the use of humor or ridicule to expose societal stupidity.
This scene, of course, never actually happened.
Vainglorious craving for the spotlight does that sound like anyone you know?
Weve already established that the O.J.
If modern reality TV was a gruesome monster created from the stew of O.J.
coverage, thenKeeping Up With the Kardashianswas obviously an egg laid from that monster.
And granted, that wincing is exactly what so many experience while watchingThe People v. O.J.
But audiences are confusing the Kardashian kids inclusion in the narrative with some kind of a moral endorsement.
Some have even accused Ryan Murphy of cutting to the children simply to boost the shows ratings.
When, in fact, they are a peripheral but ineradicable crumb of the O.J.
CASEY ANTHONY FOUND NOT GUILTY!!!!
I am speechless!!!
and the internet blew up with heckling responses?
GET AWAY WITH MURDER.
It was completely fair to slam her then.
Just so long as you realize thats what the show is doing.
This one satiric element has backfired forThe People v. O.J.
Simpsonbecause the Kardashians appall too many people.
Simpson story crawled out of those two years with any integrity intact.
And when that zit burst, it looked something like this:
